I have just received an anonymous tip in my inbox: it appears to be an email sent out by Hazel Gashoka, the Interim Chief Arbitrator of the Student Arbitration Committee (SAC), addressed to Dave Molenhuis, the SFUO Board of administration's Chair, and forwarded to the all members of the BOA and student media:
Dave Molenhuis, Chair of the Board of Administration of the Student
Federation of the University of Ottawa
Student Federation of the University of Ottawa
85 University Private, Room 07
Ottawa, Ontario K1N8Z4
Hazel Gashoka
78 Templeton
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6X3
September19, 2011
Dear Chair,
It has come to my attention that there is a motion before the Board of Administration to dissolve the Student Federation of the University of Ottawa (SFUO)’s Student Arbitration Committee (S.A.C).
Please consider that, within the SFUO, should the Board of Administrators dissolve the S.A.C., it would be analogous to the Parliament of Canada abolishing the Supreme Court by majority vote.
As per By-Law No. 8.2 of the SFUO Constitution, the S.A.C. is the “judicial authority of the Federation”, and according to By-Laws No. 8.2.1 to 8.2.3, it has the power to “interpret the By-laws, the policies, and resolutions of the Federation; decide upon the constitutionality of any action taken under the Constitution [...]; impose sanctions on any member of the Federation..."
The S.A.C. is of fundamental importance to the integrity of the Federation and one of its most vital and well-known mandates is to handle allegations of election rules violations in the election of SFUO Executives and other student representatives to the Federation.
Independence of the S.A.C. Arbitrators is essential to enable an effective role within the Student Federation of the University of Ottawa, as highlighted by an understanding of the provisions of the SFUO Constitution, and I believe that, in the current context, I have done everything possible to ensure the independence of Arbitrators and of the Committee. There have been serious concerns with respect to the manner in which political figures within student government have tried to exercise influence on previous elections and, therefore, I am firmly opposed to the dissolution of the S.A.C.
Given that the by-laws have not been changed, I will continue my role as Interim Chief Arbitrator. According to By-Law No. 8.3.4, “the President of the Federation, the Chairperson of the Board of Administration and the Chief Arbitrator of the Student Arbitration Committee shall recommend arbitrators to the Board of Administration which shall ratify them as vacancy occurs”. At this time, all the positions – except for Chief Arbitrator – are vacant. As such, I will schedule interviews with the 40 applicants and I trust that you and the President of the Federation will be present during these interviews. Such is the law until the By-laws are changed. I would urge you to stop violating the by-laws and to actively ensure that the By-laws are respected. For actions to be taken implying that the By-laws will be changed is irresponsible, disruptive, and disregards our rules.
Sincerely,
Hazel Gashoka
Interim Chief Arbitrator
Student Arbitration Committee
cc: Members of the BOA, SFUO executives, Student Media
The motion which Hazel referenced in her email can be found in English and in French.
More to come... Stay tuned!


